Instagram

The natural progression of things on the web is inevitable. One form of technology gives way to another and the fountain continues to flow. Assuming stagnation especially in the interwebs where things change by the day would be foolish to say the least.


Take into account the very need of Google OS based device since the announcement and keeping in view the growth of the Android platform since. When the announcement was first made, like everyone else I was very excited but today I would read about it in my RSS Reader and never care about it the next moment. That is the best and the worst things about the web. No matter who you are, things will change and even the best laid plans will falter.

In light of this knowledge, let us take a look into a small app that is gradually redefining the landscape of the way people share and click photographs. I am referring one of my most used apps on my iPhone, Instagram. Even if you have not used it yourself, I am sure you have seen it in bits and pieces via the links left by one of its 3,00,000 users (in less than 1 month of launch). If Twitter and Flickr were to have a love child, it would be Instagram.

What is it that has made Instagram such an overnight success. The number of photography apps in the App Store is endless, then what made it such a quick hit among masses? What is the secret sauce that founders Mike Krieger and Kevin Systrom seem to have figured out?

What problem does it solve?

For any app, the first and most important question to ask is “what problem does it solve”. The how comes later. Instagram solves the problem of sharing our moments effortlessly with the world and in a way that makes us look creative. I have talked about tapping the ego of the user and Instagram taps into our inherent urge to be creative (hipster if you may). In one click it allows me to explore the world of people who are not only far more creative but also share brilliant photographs despite the limitations of the device and the app (if you question this, have a look at Dan Rubin’s Instagram timeline).

Unlike Flickr where the focus is porting over friends and family from other network or seeing what they are uploading once in a blue moon, Instagram founders understand that there are only a billion other ways to do that. So they went ahead and solved the more complex problem of sharing moments effortlessly and also seeing what others share, no matter whether they are friends or family or someone I have never heard of before.

Call it Instagraphy if you may!

Remember the time when all that blogging meant was writing long thoughtful pieces and along came a little blue bird that went by the name of Twitter. The landscape of blogosphere changed since then and today microblogging as a term is limited to only the social media fanatics. For the rest of the world, it is sharing opinion and views. Whether I do that in 140 words or write a novella about it should not really matter.
In a similar fashion, in a world of HD cameras and brilliant lenses, instagraphy bring photography to everybody and at all times. Every decent mobile phone is now equipped with a camera that can save a moment forever. Till now the moment was normally captured and forgotten. It was only when you ever took out the cable to sync your photographs or cared to email them to yourself that that moment was shared. With Instagram, it all happens effortlessly. Sharing photographs over multiple networks is a magical potion that Instagram has brewed very craftily (second only to the now banned Campl.us).

The retro charm at no extra cost

Instagram has a set of filters that you can apply to your photographs and it all works like a charm. The process is streamlined and the filters beautiful. The end result is a photograph that not only can be shared easily across multiple social networks but is also worth sharing and gaining some street cred for being a creative hipster.
There are other apps like Hipstamatic that do this, but personally I believe it takes skeuomorphic design to another dimension where the charm of photographs comes at a heavy price of unnecessary waiting for animations like the changing of lens or the smaller viewport to click photographs. If I were ready for that investment, I would rather go buy a retro camera than use your app!

Community

The early adopters of Instagram were designers or photographers and all sorts of creatives. Add to that the easy access to Popular photographs which are regularly updated, Instagram has the perfect tools to grow a community. The app had 100,000 users in the first 6 days (a feat that took Foursquare 6 months to complete).
The easy (though a bit confusing) way to import friends via Twitter makes it work like a charm. There is no extra effort that needs to be made to be involved in the community. The Like button comes to the rescue at times when we are too bored to comment on that awesome shot we just saw.

I do not know what lies next for Instagram. I do not know if they have given it a thought, but they seem to have tapped into a big market that is yet unoccupied or at least in its infancy. With carefully built extensions for desktop and other mobile devices, they might very well be on their way to be the next Flickr or Twitter or maybe something completely new and unheard of. After all evolution and progression are inevitable on the web.

PS: As a self initiated project I redesigned the interface of Instagram recently. Have a look at it while you are around.

You should follow me on Twitter: @tuhin

  • Pingback: Un bel servizio e una bella domanda da porsi

  • http://www.z11p.com Rob

    Why is Instagram getting so much press lately, while
    BestCamera is almost the same app and community and has been around longer? How are they different?

  • Jonny German

    I can’t see how Instagram can be taken seriously with the dismal 612 x 612 resolution. You can share quickly & easily, but you can’t share anything worth keeping.

  • Ben

    Take Jonny German’s comment and substitute:
    – “Twitter” for”Instagram”
    – “140 char limit” for “612×612 resolution”

  • anon

    Typo:

    “3,00,000 users.”

    You have the comma wrong. It’s 300,000.

  • jst

    hmmm, a little bit cocky and arrogant (about a free photo app?)
    anyway, enjoy the trip on the way down

  • striatic

    “Take Jonny German’s comment and substitute:
    – “Twitter” for”Instagram”
    – “140 char limit” for “612×612 resolution””

    twitter’s 140 character limit imposed limits that benefitted people consuming the posted content. limiting photos to 612×612 resolution confers no such benefit.

    140 characters of text looks just as good on a low resolution device as on a high resolution device. 612×612 pixels worth of photos does not.

    look, an iPhone 4 screen has greater resolution than 612 horizontal. today. so the service is already seeing its quality stretched if you merely want a fullscreen look at a photo on your iPhone or iPod.

    you can’t just grunt “twitter good. make limits good.” and expect it to apply to every situation. sometimes more is more, at least if the seemingly excess is invisible and poses no penalty to production and consumption.

    if “instagram” was positioning itself as a simple service for posting disposable photos, then the twitter comparison might make sense.

    but they say–

    “In a similar fashion, in a world of HD cameras and brilliant lenses, instagraphy bring photography to everybody and at all times. Every decent mobile phone is now equipped with a camera that can save a moment forever. Till now the moment was normally captured and forgotten.”

    if those moments look bad on a high resolution smart phone screen today, how on earth are they supposed to be preserved “forever”?

  • http://tuhinkumar.com Tuhin Kumar

    @Anon: Being in India, that is how we write the numerals here (Guessing it is the British influence). So I won’t say it is a typo.

    For everyone else wondering about the parallel between Twitter and Instagram: It is not about the limitations that makes them brothers in arm, but the possibilities within those limitations. Time and again, people have shouted Twitter is not great for meaningful conversations, but hey, it was built for sharing your bursts of micro thoughts.
    Same with Instagram. It is not intended to replace your HD Cameras or photographs from even the basic iPhone camera, but for those other moments when you just want to take a picture and share it on ALL your media in one go and look creative (or hipster), that is what it is for.
    Unlike most people, the crispy nature of photographs is not one of my biggest demands for a good moment captured.
    Twitter never did or will replace blogging/speaking, Instagram will not do the same for photography, but it is a new experience. One that needs to be taken to be understood.

  • Pingback: Instagraphy « billytompson

  • Pingback: Instagraphy | juliane011

  • Starfires

    I’m very impressed by the potential of Instagram to effortlessly share between multiple networks. In my case, real life friends are generally on Facebook and a photo community I’d there on Flickr.

    Right now, it would be really good if they unlocked the resolutions. As others have said, even the iPhone 4 can show more. At least allowing 960 would be handy.